Search for: "Federal Defender Office" Results 321 - 340 of 32,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 As a result, there is a renewed viability to many of these affirmative defenses, which will level the playing field for officers and directors defending against FDIC claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:00 am by Carolyn Elefant
Attorneys Defending Bar Requirements Say that Lawyer Must Violate Them To Bring a Challenge [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:11 pm
Mark Bennett's post at Defending People, the best criminal law blawg around, on prosecutors concern for children, but only when it suits their purpose, struck a cord as I prepare for a federal sentence. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:57 am by Benjamin Herbst
  On Friday at the Baltimore City federal courthouse the 36-year-old defendant from Pasadena, Maryland was sentenced to 9 years in prison followed by 3 years of supervised release. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
An article in yesterday's Christian Century profiles the new attorney general of Oklahoma who will take office January 1 and will be active in defending Oklahoma's anti-Shariah constitutional amendment that is currently being challenged in court. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm by Rachel Konieczny
Attorney’s Office in Maryland has filed criminal charges against 20 defendants for more than $40 million in various illegal schemes, officials said Tuesday. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:57 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas on August 24, 2011 released the following: “FEDERAL GRAND JURY INDICTS ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS FOR ROLE IN CONSPIRACY TO EMBEZZLE FROM CITY OF GARLAND, TEXAS Former City of Garland Employee, Patricia Leathers, is Currently Serving a 57-Month Prison Sentence for Her Role in the Conspiracy DALLAS — A federal grand jury in Dallas has indicted three defendants for their role in a conspiracy to… [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:36 am
The office is also known as the conflict defender because its role is to take cases when a conflict with the public defender arises over representation of defendants in the same case. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:35 am by Jon Gelman
A civil action instituted by LM Insurance Corporation was stayed against a defendant employer pending a Federal criminal action. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation on November 15, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ- A federal grand jury in Tucson returned an indictment against Juan Delgado of Tucson, Ariz., charging the defendant with four counts of wire fraud. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation on November 15, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ- A federal grand jury in Tucson returned an indictment against Juan Delgado of Tucson, Ariz., charging the defendant with four counts of wire fraud. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:22 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
For instance, in one recent federal drug case, an officer found methamphetamine and cocaine in a defendant’s car after the claiming the defendant consented to a search. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:41 am by aa110potter
Defending Against Federal Charges The federal government and Nevada have numerous overlapping criminal laws. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 8:59 pm
I don't want any county in our circuit to ever be subject to a federal court action for ineffective (provision) of counsel," Edwards told the board.entire post... [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
But even in the cases that have held under applicable law that the business judgment rule does not protect the defendants from negligence claims, the court’s conclusion that the business judgment rule did not protect them did not depend on the mere fact that the defendants were bank directors and officers. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
But even in the cases that have held under applicable law that the business judgment rule does not protect the defendants from negligence claims, the court’s conclusion that the business judgment rule did not protect them did not depend on the mere fact that the defendants were bank directors and officers. [read post]