Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 3:03 am
[Federalist Society SCOTUS Brief video with Jay Schweikert on Ramos v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:26 am
Kim, in which the federal government ultimately prevailed. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
As support for its position, AFSA cites to Justice Breyer’s observation in Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Levine today. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:35 pm
Levine, discuss the power of the FDA, federal pre-emption and what the upcoming ruling means for the future of Pharmaceutical companies and the FDA. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
The case is Matorin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Levine, 788 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1986), as interpreted by cases such as Papir v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Levine (2009). [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:46 pm
Levine, relating to the issue of whether the federal preemption doctrine ought to prohibit drug injury cases. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:56 am
Does Buckman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:14 pm
The company argues that the state law is pre-empted by a federal law requiring drug labels to be approved by the FDA.The question on which the Supreme Court granted cert in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
“The Bush v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
The bills are necessary because of a February 2008 Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
Soon, Donald Trump, Jr., retweeted Levin. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
Levine. [read post]
Indiana Municipalities’ Franchise Fee Lawsuit Against Online Video Providers Remanded to State Court
23 Nov 2020, 10:29 am
Applying the comity analysis outlined in Levin v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
Smith, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am
” At Federal Regulations Advisor, Leland Beck discusses last week’s grant in a pair of cases involving the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
