Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Levine. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), defendant has to demonstrate the conflict between state and federal law by “clear evidence. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
Frost v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:31 am
Joseph Herndon: Mitchell International v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Under the MDA preemption provision, federal law displaces any state “requirement” that differs from the federal requirement and that relates to safety. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
July 24, 2015); and most recently, Stevens v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm
Levine (2009)), which it urged did not adequately define the “clear evidence” standard, allowing lower courts to hold defendants subject to inconsistent and unreasonable verdicts. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:41 am
LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling [in Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am
Levine, The Law of Government Ethics: Federal, Ontario and British Columbia, 2d ed. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
The third case—this time asserting Ohio claims and having them heard in an Ohio federal court—was called Buchanan v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
We let Avandia have it here.Guvenoz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Alston v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm
FTC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:14 am
By Jay Levine and Ryan Graham In a long awaited decision, the FTC’s chief administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled against FTC staff and held that LabMD did not violate Section 5 of the FTC Act by not reasonably securing customer data. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
Under Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 11:08 am
Cal.) dismissing plaintiffs’ failure to warn claims as preempted based on the Wyeth v. [read post]
