Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 321 - 340 of 12,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am by Frank Cranmer
The Court therefore considered that the impugned measures fell within the margin of appreciation afforded to the national authorities in this sphere. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Emotional perception Goose In Emotional Perception v Comptroller [2023] EWHC 2948 the court considered whether an AI invention fell under the computer program excluded subject matter for patentability (and whether the claim had a technical contribution outside of a computer program). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:53 pm by John Hochfelder
Defendants appealed arguing that the damages awards were excessive; however, in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:58 am by Giles Peaker
Lowe v Governors of Sutton’s Hospital In Charterhouse (2024) EWHC 646 (Ch) A High Court appeal of a first instance county court judgment by HHJ Luba KC, which we noted here. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by David Klein
As our readers are aware, a flurry of eavesdropping lawsuits have been filed in the wake of the Ninth Circuit decision in Javier v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In the Court's view, the best description of the correct approach for a judge to assess evidence in trade mark infringement and passing off cases is found in Mr Justice Jacob's judgment in Neutrogena v Golden [1996] RPC 473: "The judge must consider the evidence adduced and use his own common sense and his own opinion as to the likelihood of deception. [read post]