Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1" Results 321 - 340 of 609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by admin
 That law provides, in part:  (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false… [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 8:13 am by Lax & Neville LLP
Roth violated Sections 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-14 and 13b2-1 of the Exchange Act, and sets forth other charges of aiding and abetting in the violation of the aforementioned rules. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background Satyam was quickly dubbed the "Indian Enron" when it was revealed in January 2009 – in a stunning letter of confession from the company’s founder and Chairman -- that more than $1 billion of revenue that the company had reported over several years was fictitious. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Note that under American law, sex for which consent is procured by a lie is generally a crime only (1) when the fraud relates to the nature of the act (i.e., the defendant claimed he was a doctor who was going to medically examine the woman’s genitals, or perhaps even administer a medical cure by having sex with her), or (2) in some states, when the defendant impersonated the woman’s husband. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:16 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
At trial, he was convicted not only of a DUI, but also of obstructing and hindering and giving a false or fictitious name to a police officer. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
See Lord Denning MR’s statement in Fraser v Evans [1969] 1 QB 349, 360. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am by Camilla Hrdy
Pure Solar Co., No. 5:16-cv-01814, 2016 WL 11019989, at *1 (C.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 11:15 am by Bexis
§1446(c)(1) specifically addressing this issue). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:09 am
The district court also rejected plaintiff's claims that defendants were liable under the FDCPA because Quall was not “meaningfully” involved in the debt collection lawsuit filed against plaintiff, Taylor, at 1061-62, and that defendants violated the FDCPA by filing the debt collection lawsuit against him without first having registered Unifund’s fictitious business name with the state of California, id., at 1062. [read post]