Search for: "Fight v. State of Indiana"
Results 321 - 340
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
McGregor (Indiana-Indianapolis), Mark E. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) … [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
For example, if the OCC were to preempt an Indiana credit card disclosure law, it could apply the same standard to other credit card disclosure laws with similar language. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., we serve clients throughout Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:27 am
P2P.com, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:03 am
Because the laws of various states regarding non-compete clauses differ significantly, cases involving these provisions often entail fights at the outset as to the proper venue. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and Chicago, we represent clients of all sizes throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, and throughout the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
The Court of Appeals erred in effectively holding that Indiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:32 pm
By Patrick ZiepoltIn Bailey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:46 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
By Meaghan KlemAddressing an issue of first impression in Indiana law, the Indiana Court of Appeals held Thursday that “circumstances of animal cruelty may create exigent circumstances to permit a warrantless search of the curtilage,” and that the results of the curtilage search may provide probable cause for a further search of the property.In Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
