Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Thronson, Mary Pat Treuthart, Yolanda Vázquez, Robin Walker Sterling, Richard A. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Since the hearing for Warner-Lambert v Actavis in February (IPKat post here), there has been growing speculation as to how far the UK Supreme Court would adopt the EPO approach, or seek to limit the requirement for plausibility.The case in questionIn the Court of Appeal ([2016] EWCA Civ 1006), Lord Justice Floyd upheld the High Court decision that claims 1 and 3 of the patent were insufficient. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:57 am
Wainwright, Roe v Wade, Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
This question is posed by Floyd LJ in the introduction to the Court of Appeal decision on the Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2018] EWCA Civ 2211. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:44 pm
The case, Cockrum v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:34 am
At trial, evidence was presented that one morning Floyd gained the trust of a boy who ... [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
Following Masih v Yousah (2014) EWCA Civ 234 (our report), it was not enough for the notice to state rent due at the time of service to rescue the omission. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 2:12 pm
See State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:28 am
The named Defendants are the Creek Nation Principal Chief,James Floyd; the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”); and the Hon. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
In Lundbeck v Infosint [2011] EWHC 907 (Pat) (IPKat post here), Mr Justice Floyd observed in obiter that, according to the principles of novelty adopted in the UK courts, an overlapping range is novel solely on the basis that it is a narrower selection. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:47 am
According to a prior Disputing blog post: In Jody James Farms, JV v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Finally, Floyd LJ noted that it was not determinative that Edwards’ counsel had stated whilst cross-examining Prof Moore that a particular point would be pursued with Prof Lutter (which never happened). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:30 am
In Jody James Farms, JV v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
