Search for: "Foote v. Grant" Results 321 - 340 of 1,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 12:54 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The assumption of risk defense was recently upheld in the Centre County trial court decision of Vail v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The respondents again applied to have the s.4(2) order lifted on the footing that there were no pending/imminent proceedings. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
Michael Tappin QC (sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court) It is common in English patent litigation for patentees to make an application to amend a patent post grant and in the course of litigation pursuant to section 75 of the Patents Act 1977 – for example in order to delete invalid claims in order to remove dependencies or to hone the claims in order to make them more impregnable as a validity challenge. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 3:00 am
In the case at hand, the "call" set the boundary of that property being granted by referencing the boundary of another property beyond which the lands being granted did not go. [read post]