Search for: "Foster v. United States of America" Results 321 - 340 of 359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 1:03 pm by Greg Herman-Giddens
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Quincy, MA; Michael Foster, President) B&L Industries, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
– section 22 orders (IPKat) IP Court Users’ Committee publishes ‘Working Group’s Consultation on Proposals for Reform of the Patents County Court’ (PatLit) IPO holds ‘trade mark surgery’ (Class 46)   United States US General David Kappos confirmation hearing (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Maier & Maier) (Patent Docs) To… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  Prejudice has no place in the United States of America. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
The gay activist and the evangelical pastor may both deplore the ravages of HIV/AIDS, but find themselves unable to bridge the cultural divide that might unite their efforts. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
About 446 unit employees have Chinese surnames and were born in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
Just as democratic progress fostered progressive tort reform, democratic decay over the last few decades has fostered regressive changes in the law of torts. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
------------------------"The United States incarcerates more people than any country in the world," said the Pew Center on the States, in a report released February 28, 2008, One in 100: Behind Bars In America 2008. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]