Search for: "Fox v. FCC"
Results 321 - 340
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 6:05 pm
This is part of a series of posts discussing the background of the Supreme Court's "fleeting expletives" case from last week, FCC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:05 pm
This is part of a series of posts discussing the background of the Supreme Court's "fleeting expletives" case from last week, FCC v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:00 pm
In the spirit of Marc's posting on the footnote to Justice Stevens's dissent in FCC v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:05 am
I have written at short and great length about the desirability of opening up more wireless frequencies to flexible uses, and in particular freeing up spectrum currently devoted to... [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:39 am
I wonder if this assumption is a fair one when award shows like Oscars and Golden Globes typically feature the celebrities characterized by Justice Scalia (in FCC v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:05 pm
This is part of a series of posts discussing the background of the Supreme Court's "fleeting expletives" case from last week, FCC v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:00 pm
FCC v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:33 am
Supreme Court: FCC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:20 pm
The Supreme Court today vacated the Third Circuit's decision and remanded the case to that court "for further consideration in light of FCC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 12:37 pm
FindLaw's Michael Dorf analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling in FCC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:13 am
In my latest FindLaw column, I discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision in FCC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
The expletives ruling was in FCC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
The Court handed down a bevy of rulings, the biggest being FCC v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:47 am
Fox Television Stations Inc.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE - Agency Action - Standard Of Review"The FCC's new policy that fleeting expletives may be actionable and its order finding the broadcasts at issue actionably indecent were neither arbitrary nor capricious. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:15 pm
Fox Television Stations, Inc. that the FCC has the power to regulate even the briefest expletives which are aired on television stations, but declined to rule whether this power violated the 1st Amendment. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:15 am
The case is FCC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:27 am
The Legal Times' Tony Mauro discusses the Supreme Court's 5-4 "fleeting expletives" decision here. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:55 am
In yesterday's ruling in FCC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:11 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, COMMUNICATIONS LAW, ENTERTAINMENT LAW, MEDIA LAW FCC v. [read post]
