Search for: "G.L. "
Results 321 - 340
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
The complaint asserted claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit and violations of the Wage Act, G.L. c. 149, Secs, 148, 150. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See G.L. c. 30A, § 14(7). [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See G.L. c. 30A, § 14(7). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
Except when a case is resolved under G.L. c. 90 § 24D, the offense of driving while under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol will result in the suspension of a license for at least one (1) year with the possibility of it being suspended for life, and it will cost up to $1,200.00 for the license to be reinstated. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:14 pm
The Court interpreted the word "used...by [the] college" in G.L. c. 22C Sec. 63 not to be exclusive. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:14 pm
The Court interpreted the word “used…by [the] college” in G.L. c. 22C Sec. 63 not to be exclusive. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:57 am
He filed suit under the Wage Act, G.L. c. 149, Sec. 150. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:59 am
., 465 Mass. 165 (2013), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court [SJC] clarified a number of issues about the interrelation of the wrongful death statute, G.L. c. 229, consumer protection claims under G.L. c. 93A and the survival statute, G.L. c. 228, §1. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:59 am
., 465 Mass. 165 (2013), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court [SJC] clarified a number of issues about the interrelation of the wrongful death statute, G.L. c. 229, consumer protection claims under G.L. c. 93A and the survival statute, G.L. c. 228, §1. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:59 am
., 465 Mass. 165 (2013), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court [SJC] clarified a number of issues about the interrelation of the wrongful death statute, G.L. c. 229, consumer protection claims under G.L. c. 93A and the survival statute, G.L. c. 228, §1. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:25 pm
In these cases, the court was guided by the policy goals reflected in G.L. c. 94C, § 32L, the law that decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
See G.L. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Several new faculty members have joined the Brown School and the School of Law at Washington University in St. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:39 pm
Since G.L. 94C Section 32L was passed many lawyers warned their clients that sharing a joint with a friend might be considered a crime and that being caught engaging in that conduct would, at a minimum result in an arrest. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
The Supreme Judicial Court stated, Were the defendant serving a sentence in a correctional institution in this Commonwealth he would, both under art. 11 and by statute (see G.L. c. 277, § 72A, inserted by St.1963, c. 486), have the right, if he requested it, to a prompt trial on the pending indictments. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 2:38 pm
In the Morales case, the Court describes G.L. c. 208, § 28 as establishing a different standard for a modification, the inconsistency standard. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
An invasion of a consumer's rights may be a violation of G.L. c. 93A, but unless the consumer has suffered a separate, identifiable harm arising from the violation, there will be no remedy. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm
Chicago Title Insurance Company, 420 Mass. 422 makes clear that G.L. c. 40, §54A “does not affect the owner’s title to the property. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:04 am
G.L. c. 93, Section 80 makes such language unenforceable and, in fact, a violation of G.L. c. 93A, the Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
While the district court held that a plaintiff would have to demonstrate a tangible economic injury in order to maintain a suit for violation of §105, the SJC took a broader view: When a merchant acquires personal identification information in violation of § 105 (a ) and uses the information for its own business purposes, whether by sending the customer unwanted marketing materials or by selling the information for a profit, the merchant has caused the consumer an injury that… [read post]
