Search for: "Generes v. Campbell" Results 321 - 340 of 1,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
Kat friend Jake Campbell of the TLT firm has shared his thoughts on the recent case of FIL Ltd & Anor v Fidelis Underwriting Ltd & Ors, and why the shadow cast by Arnold J's reference to the CJEU in Sky v SkyKick clouds the result. [read post]
12 May 2018, 3:03 am by INFORRM
  Whilst the results of defamation take-down requests to Google tend to be very hit and miss (one good result does not predict another), the costs of instructing solicitors to make them tend to be relatively low in general terms. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:57 am by Shea Denning
And if you hear that so-and-so stole something from your local Belk’s, you can generally picture the scene of crime, since, outside of the big cities, there is generally just one Belk’s in town. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
But there is no general exception for opinions and accurate factual claims about a particular person. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
IN SUPPORTArt Neill New Media RightsElizabeth Rosenblatt Organization for Transformative WorksJack Lerner, Brian Tamsut, and Jovan C. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How do we decide whether a particular provision is necessary to promote competition, at which level of generality? [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:25 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Jordan, former senior toxics lawyer with EPA’s OPP and Office of General Counsel. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
The laws are made by our government and by common law precedents passed down from generation to generation from Court to Court and from Judge to Judge. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
“As a general matter,” Snyder explains, “when anybody ever narrates his or her life story, the events they choose are illuminating. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Notwithstanding that the words ‘with a view to publication’ are specifically used in the DPA, the Court of Appeal in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 held that this exemption applies to the media both before and after publication. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
The analogy with Andy Wharol’s representation of the Campbell Soup cans was not appropriate - said the court - as in the case of Wharol nothing suggested (as was instead the case of Klasen) that he was responsible for the graphics of the Campbell Soup cans. [read post]