Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 321 - 340 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
The chief justice wrote, “Our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court recounts the history of the first executive order and explains that its purported purpose was to “protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
The court summarily affirmed North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
European Models from the 1980s were driven both by the principles of free movement basic to the European Union Treaties within the context of de-socialization from the 1980s.[21] The contemporary approaches of European states represent a long dialogue (sometimes quite strident) between markets driven states and the brand of markets-rejecting European Marxist Leninism that characterized the old Soviet Empire and its satellites in Europe. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Rosen
In Administering the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age, Jim Harper critiques the limited privacy protections provided by current Fourth Amendment doctrine and calls on courts to adopt a new approach—one guided by Justice Pierce Butler’s forgotten dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am by Meg Kribble
The Frankfurter Papers are of special note because they reveal how the Supreme Court approached the Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
District Court for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois: Simon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued yet another judgment on the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive: it is Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (AKM) v Zürs.net Betriebs GmbH, C-138/16.In a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commercial Court of Vienna, the CJEU was asked to determine whether… [read post]