Search for: "Go v. Martinez" Results 321 - 340 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
These lawsuits may remedy what is happening now, but we need a real solution going forward so that future law students aren’t left holding the bag. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Defendant law firm works on the case for a while, and as the statute of limitations nears, tells the client that it's not going to go forward, and that the client should seek other counsel. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Arizona, 10-9742, for Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 11:20 am by Venkat
(I blogged about a Western District of Washington case whre Judge Martinez allowed the claim to go forward at the early stages: “Court Allows Microsoft's Claims for Contributory Cybersquatting and Dilution to Move Forward”; see also Eric’s post about SolidHost v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
He contended that positive obligation under Article 8 means that there should be a legal requirement that the press notify individuals in advance if their privacy is going to be invaded. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Thomas, No. 10-63, or Martinez v. [read post]