Search for: "Golden v. State of California" Results 321 - 340 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Both this week’s winners of golden tickets are one-time relists: Hawkins v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
State law specific, and deals with technical issues of whether a  municipal ordinance is preempted by state law, but an interesting read even for those who do not practice in the Golden State. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The California Legislature extended the requirement to other states that sell eggs in the Golden State in 2010. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
After Mark breaking post, here's our own Neil's insightful piece on that happy-ending story.* The final curtain in the GOLDBEAR sagaThe word "end" in the Haribo v Lindt golden chocolate bear litigation (see IPKat posts here, hereand here) has just been put by German Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
(a case involving a private university in California, where state law prohibits private schools from making or enforcing rules that would violate the First Amendment rights of students). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
  Four cases from the Golden State—Moscoe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:17 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The major increase in California, noted here, a state that gone full bore in softening its approach to crime, further supports the idea that a general softening is a significant contributing cause.While I might quibble with the wording of the theme, the renewed attention to law and order is appropriate and welcome. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
Youngblood and California v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]