Search for: "Goldman v Goldman" Results 321 - 340 of 2,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2019, 12:38 am
 In the Matter of the Department of Enforcement, Complainant, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:07 am by Jonathan Bailey
Rubin at Bloomberg Law reports that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Georgia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Goldman Sachs, the banking service for Apple Card, released a statement saying, “We have not and never will make decisions based on factors like gender. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
  Finding for Goldman, Judge Forrest’s February decision was a stark contrast to the general agreement among U.S. courts that when a party embeds a photo into an article, and thus, does not actually create a copy of the image or store it on its server, there is no new “display” of the photo for copyright purposes, and as a result, no copyright infringement - although case such as Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
Goldman twitted about the denial of cert in Herrick v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Second, the plaintiff probably would have sued Mic anyway for the embeds (see Goldman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The judge relied heavily on the reasoning in Gillies v Goldman Sachs Canada Inc., 2000 BCSC 355 (CanLII) where the British Columbia Supreme Court provided a list of factors that help determine if an employee has a reasonable expectation of entitlement to a bonus: (a) whether a bonus was received in prior years; (b) whether bonuses were required in order to remain competitive with other employers; (c) whether bonuses were historically awarded and the employer had ever exercised… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:53 am
The Delaware Chancery’s refusal to dismiss a derivative allegation in a suit claiming that Goldman Sachs directors were paid excessively may soon provide a decision that offers companies guidance on setting board of director pay (Stein v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Professor Eric Goldman has commented on one of the suits. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38 [2006]; see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]; Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d 1093, 1095 [2014]). [read post]