Search for: "Goldstein v Held" Results 321 - 340 of 886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred when it held that it has jurisdiction under 33 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
This means we get cases like Goldstein upholding a state sound recording right, or copyright law being used to remove known subject matter from the public domain. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Oklahoma, 15-9173, won a per curiam reversal, in which the court held that the Oklahoma Supreme Court was wrong to declare that Payne v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Alabama – in which the Court held that the Eighth Amendment forbids mandatory life-without-parole sentences for a juvenile homicide offenders – the court last term issued Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:52 am by Scott Michelman
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the respondents in Comcast v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
True, the Court does not hear full oral arguments between the end of June and the beginning of October (except in extraordinary circumstances, as when it held a reargument in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Friedrichs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
§ 1, as the court of appeals held below, or are insufficient, as the Third, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits have held. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]