Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
It was accepted that highly localised sales can give rise to a protectable goodwill. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
Dubuque v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 4:35 am
Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
And whose goodwill was at issue.Maryland Stadium Authority v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
In Hall v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:37 pm
Sciele Pharma Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
In an unpublished opinion in Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:10 pm
In Pinnacle Pizza Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm
The Court reiterated a number of principles: that A1P1 protects current possessions, not an entitlement to future ones (Marckx v Belgium para 50); that a professional’s business clientele could amount to a possession (Van Marle); that revocation of a license or permit may be an interference with a possession (Fredin v Sweden); and that goodwill may be an element in the valuation of a professional license (paras 88-93). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
“Owner” or BusinessRelying on Redevelopment Agency v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:34 pm
Source Wikipedia In Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491, [1990] RPC 341, [1990] WLR 491, [1990] 1 All ER 873, [1990] UKHL 12, Lord Oliver said: "The law of passing off can be summarised in one short general [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
The yoghurt case in question is Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [the decision of Briggs J at trial is at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here; the appeal decision, at [2014] EWCA Civ 5, featuring Lords Justices Lewison, Kitchin and Longmore, is noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
Authorship of photographs and ownership of image rights in Nigeria: Banire v NTA-Star TV Network Ltd
24 Sep 2021, 6:55 am
However, to succeed in such action, the plaintiff must establish that: (a) his/her image has acquired sufficient goodwill such as quantifiable goodwill which can be leveraged on in consideration for money; (b) the third party has misrepresented to the public by using the image and; (c) this misrepresentation caused or is capable of causing damages such as reduction in the value attached to their goodwill. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:48 am
In the past, we could point to the Loral Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
Game Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:23 pm
Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:27 am
In Source Perrier (Société Anonyme) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:47 am
Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v. [read post]
