Search for: "Grant v. Department of Veterans" Results 321 - 340 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-916, which was granted this week after being rescheduled once and relisted once, involves a provision of the Veterans Benefits Act that says that contracting officers “shall award contracts on the basis of competition restricted” to small, veteran-owned businesses if there is “reasonable expectation[] that two or more” such businesses “will submit” fair and reasonable offers. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:30 am
 A9244 Heastie -- Relates to the termination of a residential lease by a victim of domestic violence Same as S 6351 BLURB : RP L. termination lease vic dom v Last Act: 08/15/07 signed chap.616 S2174 LANZA -- Creates a twenty-five year retirement plan for peace officers and police officers in the department of taxation and finance Same as A 4466 BLURB : R & SS. 25 year retire; tax dept Last Act: 08/15/07 VETOED MEMO.106… [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The IRS correctly determined that it did not have the authority to and did not grant a second six-month extension. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The Department of Veterans Affairs issued a final rule changing the reproductive health services the agency includes in its medical benefits package. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
But I suspect that even if a grant is in the offing, this case won’t be the vehicle, at least not yet: The respondent (the United States) waived its right to file a brief in opposition, and the court doesn’t ordinarily grant without at least calling for a response. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, based in Boston, ruled on June 9 in Cook v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:33 am by Holly Brezee
Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 6905 (2021), the CBCA barred the contractor from asserting its delay claim based on verbal agreements to pay for delay costs that occurred before the execution of the release. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:04 am by Marcia Coyle
The justices on April 16, 2021 will take their first look at Jane Doe v. [read post]
AB 353 would allow private employers to establish a veterans’ preference policy and uniformly grant a hiring preference to veteran applicants, regardless of when the veteran served. [read post]