Search for: "Grant v. Hobbs"
Results 321 - 334
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
Or Raffles v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
There is an ironic symmetry to United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:23 am
Jelana Hobbs D'Angelo , a 21-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Darden writes:State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Jelana Hobbs D'Angelo and against State Farm. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:35 am
The Supreme Court has granted a petition to transfer the case and has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal. 9:45 AM - Micahel Cubel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:30 am
In UMG v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Turner, No. 03-2608 Conviction and sentence for several Hobbs Act and firearms offenses based upon an attempt to rob an armored car facility are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) a Hobbs Act conspiracy is not a "crime of violence" for purposes of a charge for use of a weapon during a crime of violence; 2) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act; 3) the district court improperly instructed the… [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
COURT OF APPEALS,M SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Hobbs Act Requires Jury to Find Robbery of Drugs, Drug Proceeds, Affects Interstate Commerce United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and today it reversed. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
Hobbs v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:14 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Glen Hobbs v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
Also, courts are concerned about granting injunctions that would affect speech, as with Wal*ocaust. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
It's easier to grant protection against dissimilar goods because it's easier to identify harm in some circumstances. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 12:04 pm
US v. [read post]
