Search for: "Gray v. District Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 12:21 pm
The Central District of California has stayed Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 7:03 am
Gray, 2015 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
The federal trial court decision two weeks ago in Ballentine v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
John Gray, Christian Keller, Kyle Martin, and Aaron ShepardCase Number: 15-cv-00551 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case Filed: February 5, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 2, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-30 SEC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 3:09 pm
The district court did not err in giving the supplemental instruction. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
The district court rejected this argument. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:47 pm
§ 74.351(r)(6); Gray v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 pm
District Court Judge W. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
Philpot v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:31 am
Under no circumstances would a federal district court ever be bound by an earlier administrative decision of the TTAB. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
" Because we find that the district court's definition just won't fly, we vacate Gray's conviction and remand this case for a new trial. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
” Because we find that the district court’s definition just won’t fly, we vacate Gray’s conviction and remand this case for a new trial. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
In her judgment in the case of De Poi v Advertiser-News ([2015] SADC 21) South Australia District Court Judge Julie McIntyre found the paper had proved the truth of an imputation that De Poi had “knowingly engaged in and placed herself at the centre of dishonest electoral practices”. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
The LA Times solicited views from a number of experts who unanimously concluded no (with one anonymous attorney calling it a "gray area"). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
The federalism argument has been made in two important Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, one submitted on behalf of 22 states and the District of Columbia, and another on behalf of four law professors – Abbe Gluck, Gillian Metzger, Thomas Merrill, and Nicholas Bagley.The federalism argument is based on the doctrine of Pennhurst State Hospital v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
Why did the Court grant cert in King v. [read post]
