Search for: "Gray v. The State Bar" Results 321 - 340 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Charlestown, MA; Richard Gray, President) Blessed Travel Plus Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
(IPKat) Google – Google down to seven AdWord lawsuits – Ascentive v Google dismissed (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:51 am
Is there any meaningful distinction between legal sufficiency review under Jackson v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
"   Seven years later, in Gray v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Gamboa objected, and argued that the exclusion of the qualified juror was immune to a harmless error analysis under Gray v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
  Reasons for judgement were released today (Heppner v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:24 pm
    The Fourth District Court of Appeal decision in Chindarah v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
Chief Justice Gray dissented without an opinion. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:51 am
"   The arbitrator stated that Gray didn't seriously dispute the $66,613.89 claim. [read post]