Search for: "Gross v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:48 am
On March 12, a court ruled in the case of K.L. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
The court held that the older and more broadly protective Pickering v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:50 am
In the alternative, the Superior Court of New Jersey approves a Formal Accounting. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:38 pm
Superior courts were less convinced that ABC v Lenah Game Meats was an invitation to develop the law in this way. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
The Court upheld the poison pill based on the standards set forth in Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
The Superior Court of Justice threw out the case, giving Curactive a grace period to apply to the Ontario Municipal Board under the Expropriations Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Judge Gregory Weeks of Cumberland County Superior Court found abundant evidence that prosecutors tend to tilt their selection of jurors with an eye toward minimizing the influence of African-Americans. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
Canada On 6 June 2018 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Haartz v Goldhar 2018 SCC 28. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Although she pointed to Stalter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The stipulation noted that the father's annual gross income was $475,000, whereas the mother had no income. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
When the taxpayer appealed, the Superior Court affirmed the Commissioner's decision, and the taxpayer again appealed. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:27 pm
In Trickey v Kaman Indus Tech Corp, a federal district court in Missouri found sufficient evidence that an employer actively thwarted a branch manager’s attempts to comply with a PIP. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
