Search for: "HARMON v. HARMON"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
The fact that a platform has some or a significant degree of sophistication (as it is for instance the case of YouTube) should not mean that the platform is not a mere facility.Watching Grey's Anatomy instead of studying (on a lawful copy of)Gray's AnatomyPrimary v secondary liability Fifthly (also this follows from point 3 above), the AG rejects the idea that secondary liability has now been absorbed within the harmonized primary liability regime. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:23 pm
Further, it harmonizes the Act with anti-harassment and anti-bullying laws with which employers must comply. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:47 pm
The District Court in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
Ct. 532 (2019), and lower court opinions trying to harmonize Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Members shared stories of their committed work on advocating for considered and balanced legislation and judicial outcomes on issues including: criminal sanctions on design right infringement, experimental use exceptions and patent infringement, the role of IP infringement and the Hague Convention, the interface of competition law under the Competition Act 1998 and the Patents Act, the passing of the IP Bill, Brexit, their input into the relaunch of the IPEC, references to their work in… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
(Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:15 pm
In interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:10 am
In Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm
Harmonizing Board and D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 6:37 am
“Thinking Out Loud” caseAn example of the foregoing is a case taking place in the Southern District of New York-- Ed Sheeran v Kathrin Towsend Griffin and others, in which the claim of copyright infringement is based on harmonic similarities between two songs. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
The case, Lanard Toys Limited v. [read post]
