Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 321 - 340 of 36,547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
At this point, an assessment of damages was not possible, and so it was not plain and obvious that there was no chance of compensable harm to be proven. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:51 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Atta v HDI Global Specialty SE [2023] EWHC 2028 (KB)] Atta v HDI Global Specialty SE [2023] EWHC 2028 (KB) (04 April 2023) (bailii.org) [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The Attorney General can file a lawsuit to halt deceptive practices without needing to demonstrate anyone has been directly harmed, a requirement necessary for a private plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
It intended to maintain the general purpose of the offence, that it should refer to threats of violence, non-physical threats of harm, and duress, including from people in positions of power such as faith leaders. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am by Chris Castle
The difference is that those are US companies (essentially) and not a foreign government actively trying to undermine the U.S. and harm US citizens. [read post]