Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Category: Civil Procedure By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleVermont v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
NGN applied to strike out claims by Hugh Grant and Prince Harry on limitation grounds. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
TVI Energy Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 2:59 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in IBM v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
’” (slip op. at 6) (citing United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of the Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 9:57 am
"Chief Justice Hughes's plurality opinion in Perry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:02 am
In Kisela v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Hugh R. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
And petitioner’s proposed “unpredictability test”—that a judicial taking consists of a decision that “constitutes a sudden change in state law, unpredictable in terms of relevant precedents,” Hughes v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:01 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
Mossberg & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
