Search for: "Ha v. Board of Parole" Results 321 - 340 of 660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 6:23 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Today, the en banc First Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
”  Finally, the editorial board of the New York Times urges the Court to reject life-without-parole sentences, arguing that such a sentence for “14-year-olds, whose judgment and understanding have not been fully formed, takes away hope and reform and punishes them as adults, which they are not. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Joshua Matz
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Also at Bloomberg, Alex Wayne reports on the stance of business groups like the Chamber of Commerce, which has not opposed the individual mandate itself but has urged the Court to strike down the entire law if it deems the mandate unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama, involving the constitutionality of life without parole for teenage offenders, could have on some California inmates. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Florida that juvenile offenders cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for crimes other than homicide. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:40 am by Lyle Denniston
  The government has now sought a stay of the ruling, issued last Tuesday. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm by Steve Hall
But the state's pardon and parole board recommended his death sentence be commuted to life in prison. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am by Madelaine Lane
State Employees’ Retirement System, Case No. 141909, back to the State Employees’ Retirement Board for reconsideration of petitioner’s request for benefits in light of Nason v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:53 am by CJLF Staff
They just shouldn't be allowed to get out early," said John Foreman V. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Steve Hall
But no, the chief justice told The Times' editorial board on Friday, she has no position on whether it ought to be the law in California. [read post]