Search for: "Ha v. U.S. Department of Justice et al"
Results 321 - 340
of 821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
Obama (10-746) and Khadr, et al., v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Council on State Taxation et al.Amicus brief of Market America, Inc.Amicus brief of The Tax Foundation (forthcoming)Petitioner's reply Title: KFC Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:10 pm
Toyo Ink Manufacturing Co., Ltd et al. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Department of Justice (DOJ), particularly the Civil Rights Division U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
On December 15th, the ACLU will argue before an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit in Mohamed, et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:17 pm
That case is California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Central New York Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 8:44 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Rumsfeld, et al.) [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The Court also routinely denied another case in which the Justice Department had declined to respond — the case of New Jersey Peace Action, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
Myers, et al., 08-235). [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:24 am
Lamberth, writing in Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:04 pm
The bail issue (application 08A1063) is separate from the Supreme Court’s planned review of Black’s conviction; the Justices will hear and decide that case next Term (Black, et al., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
Johnson & Johnson et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Department of Justice, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:21 pm
Retirement Plan, et al., v. [read post]
