Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,654
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
Ct. 532 (2019), and lower court opinions trying to harmonize Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Members shared stories of their committed work on advocating for considered and balanced legislation and judicial outcomes on issues including: criminal sanctions on design right infringement, experimental use exceptions and patent infringement, the role of IP infringement and the Hague Convention, the interface of competition law under the Competition Act 1998 and the Patents Act, the passing of the IP Bill, Brexit, their input into the relaunch of the IPEC, references to their work in… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
(Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:15 pm
In interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:10 am
In Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm
Harmonizing Board and D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 6:37 am
“Thinking Out Loud” caseAn example of the foregoing is a case taking place in the Southern District of New York-- Ed Sheeran v Kathrin Towsend Griffin and others, in which the claim of copyright infringement is based on harmonic similarities between two songs. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
The case, Lanard Toys Limited v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
On Brian Brooks’ first day as Acting Comptroller of the Currency, the OCC issued a final rule intended to resolve the legal uncertainty created by the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
