Search for: "Harmon v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
E.g., Kelly v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:48 pm
T-Mobile West, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Ana Loloei & Allyson B. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
However, under United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:22 pm
New York State Restaurant Association v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Ramos v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
Mitsubishi Corp., the Federal Circuit considered an amendment to the definition of patent infringement in § 271(a) that was made for TRIPS compliance and stated, "[W]e must recognize one of the agreements' declared purposes: harmonizing worldwide patent law." [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:15 am
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am
” Brown v. [read post]
Personnel services company pays $9.9 million to settle False Claims Act case for underpaid Visa Fees
10 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Michael Harmon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:52 am
Kirby v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:26 pm
White v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
For her, the CJEU’s decisions ‘have contributed greatly to the overall EU harmonization project’. [read post]
