Search for: "Havens v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Many brands from the distant past have fallen by the wayside or haven't been used in years or even decades, despite some still fondly remembering them. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Many brands from the distant past have fallen by the wayside or haven't been used in years or even decades, despite some still fondly remembering them. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
They hope to take advantage of a never-used aspect of Article V, which says in part that Congress, “on the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
TCL and Philips v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, in Meredith v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Cir. 2019); United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
”Ananda V. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am
The State, in defense of the Regulations, argued that the provisions challenged haven’t been used against anyone. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:01 am
This was novel at the time, since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has long maintained, since Nicaragua v U.S. (1986), that self-defense is only available if a non-state armed group is “sent” by a government, not where a group independently attacks. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
Two state troopers, Lt. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Unsurprisingly, the cases dealing with the existing employee speech protection statutes—usually under BFOQ-like exceptions—haven't reached a clear solution to the problem. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
In Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"Don't blame us that we haven't fired Joe Schmoe for his speech," the employer might say; "the law tells us we can't. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"Don't blame us that we haven't fired Joe Schmoe for his speech," the employer might say; "the law tells us we can't. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Catnwell v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
While I haven’t done close comparison between the laws of Washington and California regarding agency, I have to think they are similar enough that the difference in outcomes was not entirely a function of differences in state law. [read post]
