Search for: "Hopkins v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm by David Kopel
To begin with, the A.G. had two databases about mass shootings in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
But isn’t the EEOC there to speak for the United States? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States Jurors have heard more videotaped testimony in the “pink slime” agricultural libel case brought by Beef Products Incorporated defamation case against ABC Broadcasting. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
  DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Voters in seven states weighed in on key contests in Tuesday’s primaries. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
, pp. 29-34(6) Ivan Hare Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdo [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:39 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In a similar vein, legal protections for workers in the United States against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation are not currently comprehensive. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am by Emma Snell
Wanda Vázquez Garced was arrested yesterday on bribery charges, the Justice Department has said. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]