Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council" Results 321 - 340 of 997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
And once the petition was issued, a simple majority of those landholders could vote to create the MMD and seek the required approval from the City Council and Texas Legislature. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mike Hunter  (Oklahoma’s American Indian Arts and Crafts Sales Act)City of Council Bluffs, Iowa v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Native American Rights Fund
Mike Hunter (Oklahoma’s American Indian Arts and Crafts Sales Act)City of Council Bluffs, Iowa v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
Mike Hunter (Oklahoma’s American Indian Arts and Crafts Sales Act)City of Council Bluffs, Iowa v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm by Scott R. Anderson
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:53 pm by Giles Peaker
Humber Landlords Association v Hull City Council (2019) EWHC 332 (Admin) (not on Baiili yet, copy of the judgment here). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
’”7 However, the Courts has applied the same “police power” analysis to constitutional challenges to condemnations by both state and federal condemning authorities, whether citing the Fourteenth or Fifth Amendment. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  After an initial Design Review Board denial of a demolition and replacement application, the City of Laguna Beach’s City Council granted Hany Dimitry a coastal development permit (CDP) to demolish his outmoded and rickety 1930 house, located between the Pacific Coast Highway and the ocean; it didn’t act on his request for permission to construct a new home. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J handed down judgment in Caine v Advertiser & Times Ltd (heard 11 December 2018) [2019] EWHC 39 (QB) On 16 January 2019 the Privy Council gave judgment Nugent v Willers, heard 13 November 2018 (Privy Council) [2019] UKPC 1. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
(Ethics Council Recommendation) The Ethics Council thus appears to be working toward the construction of a set of rules of responsibility grounded in the presumption of shared responsibility which is triggered by notions of control. [read post]
  As the City’s ordinance did not give the City authority to mitigate environmental impacts not otherwise associated with design features, the appellate court ruled that the exemption was appropriate, following the logic in Bowman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  [citations]” Appellants’ argument that the City improperly delegated the elected City Council’s decision-making authority to the non-elected Planning Commission lacked merit because the Council held a full de novo hearing, and issued findings on the administrative appeal which was provided by City’s ordinances. [read post]