Search for: "Humphrey v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 1:46 pm
KSL Hotel Corp., 887 So.2d 372, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); and Humphrey v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 5:19 am
This discussion group will also address other issues related to reproductive rights, including Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Humphrey: Whether the Georgia courts erred in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:12 pm
Humphrey The famous U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
Humphrey (retired) Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
’” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the Court’s recent grant in Foster v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Humphrey, 14-8349, two relists after arrival of the record before it won its grant. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:12 am
United States. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:02 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Foster v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am
Humphrey, the Court will clarify the ban on the use of race in excluding potential jurors from the panel at trial — a ban laid down in the 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:10 am
Kentucky claim.The State's Brief in Opposition is here.The Court also took up a federal case, Lockhart v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:04 am
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349 (second post-record relist), asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, had six boxes of record arrive on the same day and likewise was relisted a second time. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]