Search for: "I v. B" Results 321 - 340 of 27,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Other conditions were also considered in the comparable agreement – (i) whether the licensing territorial scope similarly involved China, (ii) whether the number of mobile phones that utilize the six patents by Company B and Oppo have crossed 100 million, and (iii) whether the agreement was concluded through the process of standard licensing negotiations and represented the market value of the patents in question. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
(Obviously I'm not going to offer a guarantee of Chinese compliance here; I'm just talking about probabilities.) [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
(Obviously I'm not going to offer a guarantee of Chinese compliance here; I'm just talking about probabilities.) [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:08 am by David Oscar Markus
  I'm sure Scalia would have ruled for the defendant here and I bet he would have carried a majority. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:48 am by steve cornforth blog
Is it the end of O’Brien v Robinson that was decided when I was doing my A Levels?! [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. [read post]