Search for: "I.S. V. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 17,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 9:04 am
Many courts have accepted the Washington Supreme Court's holding in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Nevertheless, where state secrets are not disclosed to a court of law because of these interests, the resulting state of affairs is ‘tantamount to a removal of the court’s jurisdiction by executive ipse dixit’ (i.e. by the executive branch’s own say-so: Devenney v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:09 pm
Last month I wrote about Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:12 am
Appellant completed a sex-offender risk assessment on July 6, 2010, and on September 13, 2010, the State filed a motion requesting a sex-offender registration hearing pursuant to Ark. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:23 am
The case of Estate of Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Joanna Labastida won in State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Next, Judge Spath clarified that al-Darbi’s deposition was being conducted pursuant to a pre-trial agreement with the government, in order to preserve his testimony in case he was no longer physically available (i.e., had been repatriated to Saudi Arabia) at the time of trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the Federal law banning partial-birth (i.e., late term) abortions. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:29 am
We posted last week on Carson and Others v The United Kingdom (read judgment), in which the European Court of Human Rights rejected a claim that UK pensioners living abroad should have their pensions index-linked (i.e., that they be raised in line with inflation). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
See eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
The case at issue, Morrison et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:17 pm
Ala.) in today's Doe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm
Meyerkord v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Of particular interest is a short supplemental brief filed by the respondents (i.e., the consumers) on Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 6:03 pm
Patachou, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:34 pm
That it relates to someone being "on the rag;" i.e., concerns a woman's menstrual cycle. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
First, he gave guidance on the correct approach to the application of art 8 to the removal of non-settled migrants (i.e. persons without a right of residence). [read post]
