Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF B. M. R., A CHILD"
Results 321 - 340
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Fair Trial Denied Where Family Court Judge Took on the Function and Appearance of an Advocate In Matter of Jacquilin M, 83 A.D.3d 844, 922 N.Y.S.2d 111 (2 Dept, 2011) Jacqulin M. appealed from an order of disposition of the Family which, upon a fact-finding order of a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:16 am
J is for Junk Fees K is for Kidnapped Children L is for Life Insurance M is for Miscellaneous Income N is for Notice of Deficiency O is for Ordering Rules P is for Passive Activity Rules Q is for 1099-Q R is for Recapture (Alimony)/li> S is for Statute of Limitations – Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:44 pm
Suppose Person A has a child, B. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
In granting summary judgment, the bankruptcy court found that Accredited's mortgage interest in the debtors' real estate ("the property") extends only to husband David Morgeson's one-half interest in the property, thereby reserving wifeTina Morgeson's one-half interest for the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Because the Children Act 1989 tells the judges to make orders that are in the best interests of the child, rather than (say) in the interests of their dangerous parents. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:44 am
R. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am
A child born of a husband and wife living together is presumed to be the natural child of the husband. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Defense Attorneys: Joshua B. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Boiled down, all the statutory presumption says is that some (unspecified) involvement is in a child’s best interests (unless it’s not). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
R. 5.636(d). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that question. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bagley Northern District of Ohio at ToledoALICE M. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:01 am
Family lawyers could provide information on why spousal support is usually mandatory and defining the “best interests of the child. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
On receiving the image, the decoy replied “Wow, I’m only 13. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:33 am
Minister Moore has a very good appreciation and interest in digital issues. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
I'm not here for L.T. ... [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
(b) URLs can also convey personal data if they link to content that itself contains information about people. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 10:07 am
Trade secrets are no longer the neglected step-child of IP. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 4:28 pm
It's Texas Penal Code section 21.15(b)(1). [read post]
