Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF BTW"
Results 321 - 340
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2009, 6:21 am
Hat tip to Mediation Matters (which, btw, is a must read ADR blog)[click on the title of this post to read more...] [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:56 pm
BTW, during his Senate confirmation hearings, Gonzo expressly denied that he had expressed an opinion on the legality of torture to ANYONE, much less to the CIA. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:56 pm
Regarding, in this case, well, it doesn't matter, because I can't imagine these nominees (more than one, btw) holding such a view. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:03 pm
Because what Thomas is REALLY saying is that some rights matter to him and some do not. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:43 pm
As a matter of statutory construction, I think the answer is no; as a matter of policy, I expect the Supreme Court will say yes [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:20 am
In today's blog, he develops an insightful take on leverage:Why does leverage matter? [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:35 am
" Well, there will likely be major problems no matter what we do, the question is which approach gets out of this situation faster and more efficiently. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
These are people browsing the want ads in the back of the trade journal or the NYT (very expensive, btw). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:32 am
Once more on the actual evidence, recent comprehensive literature surveys from folks who are not Chicagoans (that shouldn’t matter but maybe it does) conclude that most forms of single firm conduct are (as hypothesized by Chicagoans) predominantly pro-competitive in practice (See great slides here from Lafontaine & Slade, Dan O’Brien or the paper from Froeb, et al – btw, the last two are by enforcement agency economists!). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:23 am
First, is Obama as progressive as we have been told on matters economic. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:51 am
The invitations reminded the clients of matters they wanted done, so simply making those contacts resulted in more work for the lawyer. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
No matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 9:11 am
What happens to SAG if matters go this long? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:37 pm
The President-Elect has made his choice apparently, and that's all that matters on personnel matters. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:49 pm
That, is a matter of opinion. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 5:20 pm
Do the numbers matter? [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:58 pm
Too many docs say...well, that's the health system, deal with it.. and btw you won't like the alternatives about 1 hour ago from web in reply to bobcoffield domjbs @bobcoffield #1 billing. #2 ease of seeing specialists … [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
The initial inquiry establishing subject matter jurisdiction is no less important than a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 2:36 pm
Individuals reading your email at a later date may not understand the use or purpose of email abbreviations such as LOL or BTW. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
So it's really just a matter of marketing spin, not anything new or improved from the evil-as-ever insurance empire.The AAA article also reminded me of something I saw in the August (?) [read post]
