Search for: "In Interest of CT"
Results 321 - 340
of 8,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Make the interest rate low (and legal); say, 5% a year. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:34 pm
Crowell prevails in the Court of Appeal.The interesting thing (to me) is that Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm
Ct. 2473 (2014). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
Court Declines Interim Mandatory Injunction Sought by Expelled LLC Member Ho v Yen, 2017 NY Slip Op 32732(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 13, 2017]. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:11 am
Here are a couple more interesting issues that came up recently in Texas published cases: Better Study Your Algebra Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 7:30 am
Ct. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:23 am
A recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in MFB Realty LLC v Eichner, 2016 NY Slip Op 31242(U) [Sup Ct NY County June 24, 2016], in which she dismissed derivative claims by a mere assignee of LLC interests, starkly illustrates the distinction and the importance of compliance with the LLC agreement’s provisions for bestowing member status on assignees. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
There's no reason to buy a CT scanner for your office when there are plenty of others available. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
It's a SLAPP appeal, and those are always slightly interesting. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:53 am
A signature card that identifies Daughter as a “joint owner” is not dispositive of an ownership interest in the account. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:13 pm
Not so fast.It's true that many times, if the Court of Appeal's interested enough to hear your writ petition, they're interested enough to grant it.But not always.Here, the Court of Appeal decides to hear the writ, but denies it on the merits. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:30 pm
So I had it in mind when I read the second footnote of the only published opinion from the Court of Appeal today.That footnote reads:"To protect the personal privacy interests of the victims, other than Gerardo Salazar who was killed, we will refer to each by first name and last initial. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
The only thing of even potential interest is a decision from the California Surpeme Court, but unless you're a doctor getting kicked out of a hospital -- or interested in those sort of things -- that doesn't exactly get one's blood boiling.So I thought I'd go back a bit. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Ct. 3034, 3047, 73 L. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:20 pm
Ct. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
Rea, (AZ Ct. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
Ct. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:03 am
Ct. [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:24 pm
And an interesting dispute between the majority and the dissent. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 11:45 am
But it's nonetheless an interesting divergence of opinion. [read post]
