Search for: "In Interest of CT"
Results 321 - 340
of 8,991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Former President Donald Trump is likely about to be indicted for the fourth time, with criminal charges imminent in Georgia stemming from an alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
With that appetite in mind, I’m delighted to blog about a recent decision from New York County Commercial Division Justice Jennifer Schecter, Rosenthal v Erber, No. 650771/2021 (Sup Ct, NY County 2023). [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:06 am
SOFT SERVE ON THE GO CUPS were distributed in the states of CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, IL, MA, MD, MI, MN, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, VA, WV. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am
That was the interesting, infrequently-litigated question addressed in a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Melissa A. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
The Appellate Division held that the family court’s failure to conduct a hearing or consider the child’s best interests before dismissing the guardianship petition and denying the petitioner’s immigration-related motion was error requiring remittance. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Google added interesting things under the fourth factor. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:41 am
Ct. 2141 (2023). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 3:38 pm
Ct. 1474 (2021)? [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:16 am
United States, 467 F.2d 488, 490–91 (Ct. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am
This interesting case falls in the category of post-business divorce disputes. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 10:43 am
Luckily, the medical professional he visited this time was more interested to hear about his symptoms and ordered a CT scan. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
McCormack (Ct. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
"(Okay, that's not an actual quote, obviously, but you get the point.)One procedurally interesting thing about all of this is that, to reiterate, all the writ proceedings transpired after the jury was empaneled and while the trial was temporarily stayed. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:54 pm
Chris Murphy (D-CT), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Katie Britt (R-AL) wrote in an op-ed about their bill in the Washington Post . [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:19 am
We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
In this particular case, where defendant Sidar has already been determined to be liable because of his refusal to provide a DNA sample, there may be reason for this Court to be less concerned about his interests than about Jane Doe's interests. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Ct. 1894, 1902, 135 L. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
The proposed instruction raises an interesting question. [read post]
