Search for: "In Interest of Jackson"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Jackson (2021) (majority opinion) No one contends that pre-enforcement review should be available whenever a state law chills the exercise of a constitutional right. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
When re-applying for IEP, applicants must demonstrate that they continue to hold at least 5% ownership interest in the start-up company. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
” It explains that “‘[t]he focus of a statute is “the object of its solicitude,” which can include the conduct it “seeks to ‘regulate,”’ as well as the parties and interests it “seeks to ‘protect”’ or vindicate. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2023. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” The Court did recognize that race-conscious remedies are permissible when there is a compelling interest in remedying discrimination. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
All nine Justices rejected the industry’s argument for an “almost per se” rule forbidding enforcement of state laws based merely on their out-of-state impact, reaffirming that the dormant Commerce Clause targets laws that purposefully discriminate against out-of-state economic interests—not neutral regulation incidentally affecting national commerce. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 5:41 am
If so/if not, are you interested in more detail connecting it up to the race and gender material that preoccupies some people these days? [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 7:57 am
“That’s why I’m introducing legislation to fix the ongoing abuse of power and ensure protection that is in the best interest of the market for years to come. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The event was moderated by Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Stanford Center for Racial Justice, along with the following Stanford Law faculty panelists: Easha Anand, Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Richard Thompson Ford, George E. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
As the Grutter Court prophesized, “[w]e expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Over the course of the past couple years, Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kavanagh and Gorsuch have broken from the majority when the issue at hand piqued their interest. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:57 am
“The Chinese government’s increasingly coercive behavior abroad and repressive policies at home challenge NATO’s security, values, and interests,” said Jens Stoltenberg, Secretary-General of NATO. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Chief Justice authored an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, and Jackson. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:01 am
Evaluation: Rush’s legacy is interesting and complex. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Justice Jackson also wrote a short concurring opinion stressing that the decision was tied to the specific facts alleged and that “other cases presenting different allegations and different records may lead to different conclusions. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
In that case, the Court concluded that a stay pending an interlocutory appeal “is not a matter of right,” but is to be guided by district court reference to four traditional factors: (1) likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury, (3) injury to other parties, and (4) the public interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Readers may also be interested in Major Highlights of the January 6th Report. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
’” Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson, dissented. [read post]
