Search for: "In Interest of T. S. III" Results 321 - 340 of 6,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 9:07 am
Some highlights:He’s the “Most Interesting Man on the 9th Circuit. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:12 am by Orin Kerr
Whatever the uncertainties in the holding, it's interesting that the Court was unanimous in favor of the defense, albeit on the limited issue resolved. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm by Will
Last Friday, FDA finally released its long-awaited Transparency Initiative (now called the Phase III Transparency Report), and luckily, the troubling proposals we previously blogged about didn't make it into the final version. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:26 am by Phil Cave
Jones, III, has this issue: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING APPELLANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE EVIDENCE BEFORE HE PLED GUILTY AND WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THAT DENIAL, APPELLANT’S PLEA WAS PROVIDENT. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:01 am by Nico Cordes
The applicant's main request is thus held allowable.There are interesting deliberations in this case. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, the present case differs from case T 947/99. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Loss of compensation was definitely a cognizable injury under Article III, but it wasn’t Lanham Act commercial injury. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” But that’s not good enough when this interpretation “imposes substantive limits on the availability of relief under state law, in the service of constitutional interests that aren’t actually under threat. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Examples of domain names that they have registered include smithbarneycom.com, remingtonshotgun.com, avoncn.com, gmportal.com, foxv.com, allbarbies.com, t-mobiledealer.com and thedailyplanet.net. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:01 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In assessing what the skilled person would have done, it is precisely in order to avoid the risk of hindsight that no regard is taken of the claimed invention.6.5.2 Secondly, items (i) to (iii) merely paraphrase aspects of the technical problem specified in point 6.2. [read post]
6 May 2006, 2:49 pm
If you thought A3G's story from last fall about Judge Harry T. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:12 am
Hoege III's interesting but hideously flawed Army Lawyer article arguing that the new Article 120 is unconstitutional, the new Article 120 traces its roots to a congressional statute requiring DOD to report back to Congress with proposals to modernize the military's sexual assault laws. [read post]