Search for: "In Re: B "
Results 321 - 340
of 30,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 7:41 pm
Back in 2007, Judge Ernest B. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
The changes between R.C. 3107.07(A) and its predecessor, R.C. 3107.06(B)(4), demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:40 am
In In re: Castillo, the Bankruptcy Court for Central District of California held that "after making an 1111(b) election, an undersecured creditor may include in its 1111(b) secured claim post-petition attorneys' fees, but not post-petition interest." [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:51 pm
163 Years After Being Turned Down Because of His Race, Man Admitted to PA Bar :: In re George B. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm
Juvenile law Appellate Court slip opinion: In re Timothy B. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:14 pm
In re Caiden B. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:56 am
For publication opinions today (4): In In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:14 pm
Appellate Court Juvenile Law Slip Opinion: In re Niya B. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:04 am
Overview of the new BloombergBNA unification at Dewey B Strategic: http://deweybstrategic.blogspot.com/2013/07/bloomberg-law-re-brands-learn-this_30.html [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Yesterday's COA decision in In In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm
Citgo Petroleum Corp., 151 F.3d 402, 415 (5th Cir.1998) ("[M]onetary relief predominates in (b)(2) class actions unless it is incidental to requested injunctive or declaratory relief. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:55 pm
” In re Killian, 45 F.4th 1373, 1382 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
In re Zamorah B. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
Del. 2009); In re Plastech Engineered Prods., Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
B. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm
You can view or download the case here: In re D.M. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:55 pm
Among the many more important parts of this opinion are two points that especially interest me: DGCL Section 102(b)(7) protection is not for the benefit of officers--as compared to directors (n. 41); and The Court re-affirmed that the fiduciary duties of directors also apply to officers (n.40). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:51 am
"), petition for cert. filed (Oct. 19, 2006) (No. 06-560) with In re Charter Commc'ns, Inc., Sec. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:07 pm
If you’re hungry for more where that came from, there’s also Lemon Pound Cake… As noted in the comment to the earlier post, I found a link to the text of the complaint. [read post]
