Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 321 - 340
of 7,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
The conclusion of M. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
In attendance were Mark Gruber, Peter Cannon and DaphneGaylord, Capital Collateral Re~ional Counsel for the Defendant, Ken Nunnelley andBarbara Davis, Office ofthe Attorney General and Wayne Holmes, Office of the StateAttorney. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:47 pm
Likewise, if I want to use adjectives to describe someone, the adjectives are also gender-marked. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:19 pm
Marks. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
I'm not so sure I think that's a good idea, but after years of taking testimony in tort cases I am pretty convinced that people are bad at describing what they saw-- and that their descriptions are a poor basis for assigning liability. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
September 12, 2016 - 11 A M: Luxco, Inc. v Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C., Opposition No. 91190827 [Opposition to registration of TEQUILA as a certification mark for "distilled spirits, namely, spirits distilled from the blue tequilana Weber variety of agave plant," on the ground that the mark fails to serve as an exclusive indicator of geographic origin].September 13, 2016 - 10 AM: In re NTVB Media, Serial No. 86174087 [Section 2(e)(1) mere… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “M&A in 2023: A Year of Cautious Optimism? [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm
” In re Wella, 229 USPQ at 277. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:53 pm
I see a smile (perhaps my positive outlook on life), but I'm aware of at least one other optimist, here. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:34 pm
"Currently (and I'm hoping I finally have it), "The Middle-Class Elitism of Mark Twain's and Charles Dudley Warner's The Gilded Age. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:09 am
In re i.im.symbolic, llc, Serial Nos. 85044494, 85044495, and 85044496 (October 7, 2015) [precedential] [Refusals to register the mark William Adams, known as "will.i.am," became well known as a member of the musical group, The Black-Eyed Peas. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:15 am
In re Craig S. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
You're not? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
In re Pan American Grain Mfg. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:41 am
"... and then refuse to support the policy they’re fighting for, but one thing appears certain: this unforced error is going to leave a mark. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
A couple of observations: (1) No Notice of Suit Incoming (which is how they display regardless of whether they're about filing or resolution) showed up for the underlying litigation that led to the partial cancellation of the Louboutin mark. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:46 am
In re Bath Busters, Inc., Serial No. 90850908 (February 28, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:01 am
In re Chestek, Serial No 85072195 (March 14, 2013) [not precedential].Applicant Chestek argued that her mark is only suggestive, because it comprises an unnatural, incongruous combination. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Although a mark may be deceptive even if only a portion is deceptive (e.g., WHITE JASMINE for tea that did not include white tea, SILKEASE for clothing not made of silk), "[m]isdescriptiveness of a term may be negated by its meaning in the context of the whole mark inasmuch as the combination is seen together and makes a unitary impression. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
*Not really, I’m an IP lawyer.6. [read post]
