Search for: "In Re Clement"
Results 321 - 340
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
As I explain in the column, I thought that Paul Clement's answer was just wrong, while Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
Both Justice Scalia and the Chief Justice, for example, pressed Clement to clarify where the coercion came into play: “Is it the amount that’s being offered,” the Chief Justice asked, “that it’s just so much money, of course you can’t turn it down, or is it the amount that’s going to be taken away if you don’t take what they’re offering? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
CLEMENT: Right. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Paul Clement). 12. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
On the other hand, when you're the White House press secretary and your great defense of how it is you think you're going to win is that oral arguments can be misleading, and you don't have anything good to point to, you do know you're in trouble. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
What they are asking for, then--as a matter of constitutional right--is not the control of "their money" or "their life," but instead the freedom not to spend the federal dollars on that new population . . . but to be entitled nonetheless to re-up the deal they had previously enjoyed with the federal government. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Clement re-grounds us "in the real world. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm
” She told Clement: ”We’re going to tie the hands of the federal government in choosing how to structure a cooperative relationship with the states. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
In response, Clement stated: “we all recognize there is legislative inertia. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
Clement represents 26 states opposed to it. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
For a preview of both of those arguments and a look at what to expect in the months ahead, we're joined once again by Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:27 pm
They're being swept in and exploited to get more money to spread around. 6. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:02 pm
Most of the justices, however, we're glued to the commerce clause question. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm
You're regulating insurance. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
They don't know what kind of service they're going to need. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:41 pm
Justice Alito asked no questions of the states’ lawyer, Paul Clement. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
CLEMENT: I represent 26 States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
Clement and Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
CLEMENT: Well, with respect, Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
CLEMENT: Well, with respect, Mr. [read post]
