Search for: "In Re Cp"
Results 321 - 340
of 607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
Appeal allowed and re-trial ordered. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:50 pm
CPS Removal and TDM Meetings” [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
A retrial was ordered, but the CPS discontinued the case just beforehand. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm
” Mr Economou was refused permission to appeal but will re-apply directly to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:24 pm
By the end of the book I re-read that paragraph and thought it could even be seen as an understatement. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
See for example, In re C.S.,2007-Ohio-4919, (invalidating waiver of counsel by juvenile after mother had advised him to do so), In Re CP, 2012-Ohio-1446 (portions of Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act that impose automatic, lifelong registration and notification requirements on juvenile sex offenders violate the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in the Ohio Constitution), State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:35 am
They'll try every trick in the book because they're bad people. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:08 am
Inasmuch as, CP (I) PL was not a member of HPL, it could not have filed and maintained the complaint under Section 397 before the Company Law Board. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Baker J considered the guidance in Re EC (Disclosure of Material) [1996] 2 FLR 725 CA, noting that whilst the balance as between the factors identified in the 10-point guidance of Swinton-Thomas LJ in that case may have shifted following the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, the guidance remained valid and Re EC remains the leading authority. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
” The CPS has produced a short video on this research project. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:08 am
Sauf disposition contraire de la LTAF, la procédure est régie par les dispositions de la PA (art. 37 LTAF). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:55 pm
CP 330 is open for public consultation until 6 August 2020. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:24 am
“We’re done talking. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
I suspect a jury would have acquitted had it gone the full distance…. the CPS certainly thought so. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
As these decisions are already making clear, the re-securitization of technology is underway. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:13 am
The justice secretary also said this week that sending more people to prison for longer sentences in order to cut re-offending “does not work”. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
At MicroLaw we’re independent consultants. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
There are many similarities between the CP and the LT letters. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:05 am
The fact that the CPS appear to have withdrawn the case following enquiries as to PC Kennedy’s role by the defendants’ lawyers could relate more to his offer to give evidence for the defence than to any doubts as to entrapment. [read post]
