Search for: "In Re Goldstein" Results 321 - 340 of 845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 2:58 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the Roberts Court’s “interesting uses of precedent, including a proliferation of doctrines that purport to dilute the power of stare decisis. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Leora Maccabee
Stick to your mission & re-evaluate often. 7. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re considers the Court’s discussion of relative standing in Clapper v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Lamberth, In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 846 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012) - Ojetta R. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:55 am by Peter Mahler
The appellate court reversed the ruling below, holding that its 2007 order precluded re-opening the issue of dissolution. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
On Wednesday, we're conducting what we're calling a "head-to-head" round. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm by Shawn Wright
 They're paying their monthly minimums, but that's about all. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
" [Goldstein is a contributor to Legal Times.] [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
 If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 7:08 am by Jeff Lipshaw
  (NB: Goldstein is a philosopher-novelist with her Ph.D. from Princeton, and the author of 36 Arguments for the Existence of God:  A Work of Fiction.) [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Goldstein and some of Justice Kagan’s colleagues pushed back. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Raffaela Wakeman
You’re stuck with me for a while. [read post]