Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2019, 6:47 am
The court correctly re-evaluated its prior decision, which conflicted with these principles. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
C.D.Cal., May 15, 2017, No. 1617463), Judge Ernest M. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
C.D.Cal., May 15, 2017, No. 1617463), Judge Ernest M. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
C.D.Cal., May 15, 2017, No. 1617463), Judge Ernest M. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:23 am
It's worthy of review for anyone facing an issue re: limitiation on cross-examination. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:20 am
Whether this is because of his skin color, his attire, his age, maybe even his tattoos, the law as it exists allows the judges to determine what a reasonable person in his situation would do. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:25 am
Trial fairness requires no less. [49] In the present case, the trial judge did not make those clear, unambiguous, and comprehensive inquiries. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
This makes clear, of course, (or at minimum implies) that Madoff hasn’t told the government the relevant facts (and neither, of course, have the defendants in the various cases (some of whom have taken the 5th)), just as Picard told Judge Chin that Madoff had not cooperated and Judge Chin expressed the same view. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:05 am
Much of the media are not concerned about the limits themselves. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:05 am
Much of the media are not concerned about the limits themselves. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:30 pm
Both judges were cautious about cameras in court, with Nicol concerned about managing the “drama” and Whelan (pic) saying some judges worried about becoming media personalities. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
If one judges the British press by the standards of the Fourth Estate – and, again, it’s a perfectly simple matter to adumbrate these (take a look at page 3 of David Randall’s wonderful book The Universal Journalist, for example) – much of what appears in the British press just isn’t journalism at all. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
” Justice Scalia also recognized the unworkable threshold inquiry created by the Second Circuit decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Valckenberg, Gmbh, 122 U.S.P.Q. 334 (T.T.A.B. 1959) (MADONNA for wine); In re Reemtsma Cigarettenfab-riken G.M.B.H., 122 U.S.P.Q. 339 (T.T.A.B. 1959) (SENUSSI (a Muslim sect that forbids smoking) for cigarettes); In re Sociedade Agricola E. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 am
The preliminary inquiry judge ruled in favour of the accused. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
” The inquiry provision states that a doctor or medical professional “should refrain from making a written inquiry or asking questions concerning the ownership of a firearm or ammunition by the patient or by a family member of the patient, or the presence of a firearm in a private home” unless he or she in “good faith believes that this information is relevant to the patient’s medical care or safety, or the safety of others. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
Still, any soothing answer given by Barr will be subject to later revision, elaboration or re-interpretation. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
It's amazing how much more trustworthy people are when they know they're going to spend years in prison than when they are presumed innocent.The decision does not hold, however, that a defendant, with the potentially coercive concern being played as here, cannot enter a valid plea of guilty. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
“Carrera does not suggest that no level of inquiry as to the identity of class members can ever be undertaken. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:30 pm
The 7th Circuit found that Judge Kocoras "failed to undertake an inquiry into the proof of damages and the necessity of injunctive relief and issued an injunction that is overbroad," concludes today's ruling (.pdf). [read post]
