Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2016, 10:36 am
They’re no doubt horrified by Trump, too, as this very good post by Benjamin Wittes suggests. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
Orin Kerr writes: For those of us worried about broad readings of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the decision is quite troubling. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
” In re Warrant, 15 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
If Orin Kerr is reading Facebook v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr dissects the latest decision (and, in case you’re unclear, is no fan of the concept that people commit a crime under the CFAA based on TOS): Judge Graber also offers this distinction between terms of use and cease-and-desist letters: Finally, Nosal I [on terms of use] was most concerned with transforming “otherwise innocuous behavior into federal crimes simply because a computer is involved. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Jeff Pojanowski re: Prof. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:32 pm
If I’m reading it correctly, it says that if you tell people not to visit your website, and they do it anyway knowing you disapprove, they’re committing a federal crime of accessing your computer without authorization. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Transparency project discusses the Re X judgment and the issue of transparency versus confidentiality. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:28 am
Kerr, Computer Crime Law 48 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:04 pm
As Orin Kerr notes: “the majority’s approach practically invites officers to make illegal stops. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am
At SCOTUSBlog, Orin Kerr wrote that,Justice Kagan is right in her dissent that the majority’s approach practically invites police officers to make illegal stops. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Applying the Fourth Amendment to placing calls from a locked phone to identify its owner
22 Jun 2016, 5:45 am
If you’re with me so far, the next question is whether the search is permissible given the specific facts of this case. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:24 am
The hardworking Georgia retaliation attorneys at Mays & Kerr can aid you in pursuing a fair and just outcome in your Title VII or other discrimination case. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
The best you’re going to come up with is, well, the guy with drugs had a warrant, so there ya go. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
Re D (A child). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 5:20 am
You’re no better than the other guy. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
The 11th Circuit’s Precedent Doe’s position relies in large part on an 2012 11th Circuit decision by Judge Tjoflat, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, that applied the foregone conclusion doctrine in a somewhat similar way. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:31 pm
For excellent and up-to-date advice and advocacy, talk to the experienced Georgia overtime attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:31 pm
For excellent and up-to-date advice and advocacy, talk to the experienced Georgia overtime attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
Like Kerr, he’s unfailingly fair. [read post]
