Search for: "In Re Lamp"
Results 321 - 340
of 500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
Why can’t the printer manufacturers just settle on a single design configuration, the way lamp manufacturers use common light bulbs? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Richey, Wood & Lamping, LLP Cleveland Mary O. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:46 am
And if you’re not careful, sooner than you think. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:09 pm
Abends: Lesetätigkeit, "leichte" Lektüre, bevorzugt Reisebeschreibungen. 22 Uhr: Strengste Bettruhe. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:00 am
In re Lamps Plus Overtime Cases (filed May 10, 2011) 2011 DJDAR 6615 involved a chain of 29 stores in California being sued by three employees in its San Rafael store on behalf of themselves and similarly situated parties for alleged violations of labor laws including those pertaining to meal and rest breaks, the prohibition of off-the-clock work, and failure to provide itemized and timely wage payments. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Cir. 2011) (en banc): The dissenting opinion (Patent Docs) CAFC finds re-examined claims of U.S. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
If the customer does it, you're less likely to have problems.Isn't that arbitrary? [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:42 pm
In re Lamp Plus Overtime Cases also involved a putative class claim for off-the-clock work. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:19 am
However, Baxter itself did not procure the breach: Baxter did not know Valens was re-using the moulds: to the contrary, it was paying Valens for new moulds. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:10 am
The Reno Arch project replaced the 2,076 11-watt incandescent lamps with new highly energy efficient 2.5-watt LED bulbs. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Though of course studying dockets is vastly superior to studying opinions – if you want to know what judges are doing – we’re left still peering through a dark piece of glass. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:46 am
The latest opinion re meal period class actions is called Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, or Flores v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
(IPKat) United States US General The USTR Special 301 Report released: some initial reactions (TechnoLlama) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Docs) Protective orders put at risk by new bill – Sunshine in Litigation Act (Patent Docs) US Patents Making the patenting process faster (Patenthink) USPTO official ‘optimistic’ that Green Patent Fast Track will be extended again (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Decisions… [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:59 am
They're the next big thing in the UV field," he said. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
If you’ve committed a particularly heinous violent crime, invest in a pair of glasses: jurors are much less likely to conclude that you’re capable of such a thing if you look like a nerd. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:29 pm
James Gildea issued Order No. 11 denying without prejudice a motion to compel discovery from non-party Benjamin Halpern in Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street Lamps (Inv. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:23 am
Patent Office has also found the existing claims, including claim 32 of the '844 patent, valid over prior art raised by Candela in a re-examination proceeding. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Blawg Review #304—The "Spooked by Nukes" Edition ~~~ "A nuclear era, but I have no fear.... [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
Meanwhile, decade old perceptions of Democratic gerrymandering, and opinions based on the 93 and 98 failed plebiscites re-surfaced. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
Meanwhile, decade old perceptions of Democratic gerrymandering, and opinions based on the 93 and 98 failed plebiscites re-surfaced. [read post]
